What's arbitrary are stereotypes, period. They aren't statistics. They're suppositions at best.
Because I think you jumped the gun, initially, which lead B3 to his...post.
The point I'm trying to make is I don't believe stereotyping and supposition are even remotely similar.
Does that clear it up? ![Undecided :-\](http://www.learngospelmusic.com/forums/Smileys/classic/undecided.gif)
So, there's the initial quote. B3 says you tried to say the same thing as he did using a different word (supposition).
I've stated my contention to your discussion which lead me to remove my 'indeed'.
And, there you have it.
![Cheesy :D](http://www.learngospelmusic.com/forums/Smileys/classic/cheesy.gif)
In which is actually an argument against stereotypes. If life is like a box of chocolates and you never know what you're going to get, how do you know a person who looks like they could fulfill a stereotype will fulfill a stereotype? It makes stereotyping a waste of time.
Right. And, it isn't until one actually opens the box until they can truly say they "know" a person and actually fit into preconceived stereotypes.
Now, off to praise team rehearsal.