LearnGospelMusic.com Community

Please login or register.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Progressions for classically trained pianist: Questions, Comments, Observations  (Read 1193 times)

Offline T-Block

  • Moderator
  • LGM Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 17289
  • Gender: Male
  • I got my MBA!!!

I've decided to open this post so that those of you who are viewing the progressions thread for classicaly trained pianits can post your questions, comments, or observations about what u see there.  Let me know if the information in there is helping your or not.  Let me know if I'm making any mistakes or not. 

I will be checking this post often, so please don't hesitate to comment.
Real musicians play in every key!!!
Music Theory, da numbers work!

Offline SisterCM

  • LGM Royalty
  • LGM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
  • Gender: Female

I’m thinking if I take the hymns and songs that I have been practicing and learning, chord each song, write each song out using the number system practice using all three ways this maybe a plan whereas I will learn all three in one.  I can see it all coming together for me.

Thanks; this will definitely be helpful for me.   :)
And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men;  Colossians 3:23

Offline betnich

  • LGM Royalty
  • LGM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4131

     To reach classically trained musicians, the letters are good but I think notation is BEST. Being a music reader I can look at a score and get a sense of it right away, and no theory is needed - not all classical performers are good at theory despite perhaps being forced to study it. I remember being turned down for High School Jazz band because I didn't know chord symbols, despite years of piano lessons. Once I learned how to read/make my own chord charts a whole world opened up to me...


      The other thing is RHYTHM. Many Classical players are weak in this area, and Western notation can't capture all the nuances of Jazz or Gospel performance. But try - include some examples of rhythm patterns. IMO, many Jazz books get too heavy on the theory and don't put enough emphasis on rhythm and soloing/comping balance with other players.


Of course there is no substitute for playing/listening to good Gospel players...

Offline musallio

  • LGM Royalty
  • LGM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3404
  • Gender: Male
  • Merry Christmas to you :-)
    • Hear & Play page

     To reach classically trained musicians, the letters are good but I think notation is BEST. Being a music reader I can look at a score and get a sense of it right away, and no theory is needed - not all classical performers are good at theory despite perhaps being forced to study it. I remember being turned down for High School Jazz band because I didn't know chord symbols, despite years of piano lessons. Once I learned how to read/make my own chord charts a whole world opened up to me...


      The other thing is RHYTHM. Many Classical players are weak in this area, and Western notation can't capture all the nuances of Jazz or Gospel performance. But try - include some examples of rhythm patterns. IMO, many Jazz books get too heavy on the theory and don't put enough emphasis on rhythm and soloing/comping balance with other players.


Of course there is no substitute for playing/listening to good Gospel players...

Good points there..
This week I've really been serious on rhythm, especially since I'll be playing seriously at church now..those guys love those fast beats..they get easily bored with the slow stuff...

Thanks for the work T..I LOVE IT ALL... :)
Powered & Sponsored by Jesus Christ...
Pages: [1]   Go Up