@playhear, u think a signifcant part of the budget "should" be for the musicians??
Yes, but keep in mind, when I say "significant part" I mean "significant percentage" of the budget. That percentage might be 1%, maybe 8% or maybe 20% of the church budget. The percentage depends on the capabilities of the individual church. Whatever the percentage is, it should be "significant" to that church. Thus, a church with little cash won't be able to pay the musicians much, while a church with a lot of cash will.
Think of it like this. A top musician practices several hours a day and may have even paid a lot of tuition to go to school like you said. Many musicians prepare as hard as or harder than the pastor. Your skills are worth something.
The head of your church is probably not a musician. So, you may have been conditioned into thinking that musicians shouldn't get paid much. That doesn't sit well with me. The musicians define a church and, in my opinion, more so than the pastor. Don't be afraid to get paid. There's no sin there.
By paying musicians, the church can command more from the musicians. The musicians may not have to take the secular gigs. Over time, the musicians will become better. The music will be better. More people will show up. The church will receive more tithes. More tithes for the Lord is a way of praising God. The church can use the extra money to help the community, set up youth programs, build better facilities, raise musician salaries, etc.